ENGME554-23B (HAM)

Inspection, Monitoring and Evaluation

15 Points

Edit Header Content
The University of Waikato
Academic Divisions
Division of Health Engineering Computing & Science
School of Engineering

Staff

Edit Staff Content

Convenor(s)

Lecturer(s)

Administrator(s)

: janine.williams@waikato.ac.nz

Placement/WIL Coordinator(s)

Tutor(s)

Student Representative(s)

Lab Technician(s)

Librarian(s)

: anne.ferrier-watson@waikato.ac.nz

You can contact staff by:

  • Calling +64 7 838 4466 select option 1, then enter the extension.
  • Extensions starting with 4, 5, 9 or 3 can also be direct dialled:
    • For extensions starting with 4: dial +64 7 838 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 5: dial +64 7 858 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 9: dial +64 7 837 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 3: dial +64 7 2620 + the last 3 digits of the extension e.g. 3123 = +64 7 262 0123.
Edit Staff Content

What this paper is about

Edit What this paper is about Content

The aim of this paper is to provide a grounding in the fundamentals of both established and emerging inspection techniques and enable the student to propose reasonable assessment methods for identification and monitoring of critical defects across a variety of materials, geometries and applications.

The paper provides the opportunity for students to become familiar with some of the more commonly used maintenance approaches, monitoring and sensing technologies and inspection and assessment techniques used as methods of non-destructive evaluation and continuous monitoring, including dye pen, ultrasound, and acoustic emission. More advanced or emerging technologies, including thermal techniques, will also be reviewed. While not every student will go on to directly use the techniques in their future employment, students should consider how through life inspection can occur during the design stage of components and systems. A key outcome is that students acknowledge that one inspection technique often can not identify all defects of interest, so they must critically analyse detection limitations and propose and communicate appropriate solutions. Concepts of how inspection and maintenance are considered during design, and how defects may be considered through the use of damage tolerant design will be covered.

The learning outcomes for this paper are linked to Washington Accord graduate attributes WA1-WA11. Explanation of the graduate attributes can be found at: https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/IEA-Graduate-Attributes-and-Professional-Competencies-2021.1-Sept-2021.pdf

Edit What this paper is about Content

How this paper will be taught

Edit How this paper will be taught Content

The paper is structured using a combination of lectures to develop the theoretical understanding, laboratory sessions to develop understanding of the practical implementation limitations of some techniques and finally workshops where inspection problems will be posed that develop in complexity.

Workshops and labs share a time slots and will often be both, hence a workshop or lab will run every week, starting from week 2. Assessment will be undertaken in these sessions and in the student's study time. Students should manage their workload and ensure effort is reflective of assessment weighting. Individual assessment weightings are provided in moodle.

Edit How this paper will be taught Content

Required Readings

Edit Required Readings Content
Recommended reading and resources are provided through moodle.
Edit Required Readings Content

Learning Outcomes

Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Students who successfully complete the course should be able to:

  • Compare detection limitations of individual inspection techniques using knowledge of the fundamentals of operation. (WA1, WA2, WA5)
    Linked to the following assessments:
    In-person test (1)
    Laboratories (2)
  • Create, propose and defend an appropriate inspection routine when presented with a complex inspection scenario such as multiple materials, complex geometries or restricted access using both established and emerging technologies. (WA3, WA5, WA9, WA11)
    Linked to the following assessments:
    Workshops (3)
    Project (4)
  • Differentiate between a quality assurance non-destructive evaluation approach and a through life approach based on damage tolerance and critical defect design concepts and identify appropriate strategies for a variety of applications. (WA4, WA5)
    Linked to the following assessments:
    In-person test (1)
    Workshops (3)
    Project (4)
  • Evaluate the trade-offs and compromises addressed during the safe life extension of components and systems, including sustainable development, economics, health and safety, and the environment. (WA6)
    Linked to the following assessments:
    In-person test (1)
    Project (4)
Edit Learning Outcomes Content
Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Assessments

Edit Assessments Content

How you will be assessed

Edit How you will be assessed Content

A mix of individual and group assessments are used in this paper. Please see moodle for further instructions.

Samples of your work may be required as part of the Engineering New Zealand accreditation process for BE(Hons) degrees. Any samples taken will have the student name and ID redacted. If you do not want samples of your work collected then please email the engineering administrator, Natalie Shaw (natalie.shaw@waikato.ac.nz), to opt out.

Note: Due to COVID-19 and the availability of staff, schedule and/or assessment changes may need to occur, but will be communicated via Moodle and/or in lectures

Edit How you will be assessed Content

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0. There is no final exam. The final exam makes up 0% of the overall mark.

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0 or 0:0, whichever is more favourable for the student. The final exam makes up either 0% or 0% of the overall mark.

Component DescriptionDue Date TimePercentage of overall markSubmission MethodCompulsory
1. In-person test
10 Oct 2023
No set time
30
  • In Class: In Workshop
2. Laboratories
25
  • In Class: In Lab
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
3. Workshops
20
  • In Class: In Workshop
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
4. Project
25
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
Assessment Total:     100    
Failing to complete a compulsory assessment component of a paper will result in an IC grade
Edit Assessments Content